Topic: Time Perception

Why We Need Leap Years and Leap Seconds (The Math Formula)

UTC clock from time.gov
Screenshot showing the addition of a leap-second..
UTC clock from time.gov [Public Domain]

Leap Years require adjustments besides adding a day every four years to keep in sync with solar time. I explain its mathematical formula in this article.

How We Achieve Accurate Time Measurements

To keep our Gregorian calendar in sync with mean solar time (UTC scale), adding a day every four years is not sufficiently accurate.

We also need to add a second occasionally, known as a leap second. And we need to eliminate some leap years for further accuracy. Let's examine the details mathematically.

My Background With This

In my career as a Computer Systems Programmer, I once had to write an algorithm to determine the day of the week (Monday, Tuesday, etc.) for any specific calendar day.

That required me to have a thorough understanding of how we calculate the days in our calendar.

Why Do We Have Leap Years?

If it took exactly 365 days for the Earth to revolve around the Sun, we would have a perfect calendar and not need to make corrections.

Furthermore, if a year had precisely 365 and a quarter days, then adding a day every four years would work perfectly.

Unfortunately, our Earth goes around the Sun in 365.2426 days. So, adding a day every four years would mean we're adding too much.

We add an extra day, February 29th, every four years. However, we need to skip that addition once in a while for the following reasons.

If that additional fraction over 365 days were exactly a quarter of a day (.25), then every four years would add up to a full day precisely.

If that were the case, we would merely add that extra day at the end of February every four years.

However, since the Earth revolves around the Sun more slowly than that by a tiny fraction, we need to skip some Leap Years.

Advertisement. Scroll to Continue.

Atomic Clocks Provide Extreme Accuracy

We live in a time when we have the resources to do extremely accurate measurements.

We have the technology today to measure the Earth's rotation so precisely that we can detect minor changes to how it is slowing down. We use atomic clocks to measure time accurately.

National Standards Agencies in many countries maintain a network of atomic clocks. They are kept synchronized with extreme accuracy.

In addition, we have the master atomic clock at the U.S. Naval Observatory in Washington, which provides the time standard for the U.S. Department of Defense.

The NIST-F1, a cesium fountain atomic clock developed in 2013 at the NIST laboratories in Boulder, Colorado, is more accurate than previous atomic clocks.1

Why We Skip a Leap Year Every 100 Years

That fraction I mentioned before, 0.2426, is slightly less than a quarter of a day. Therefore, every 100 years, we need to skip adding a day in February. Otherwise, we would be adding too much.

Skipping a leap year every 100 years would only be accurate if the extra time were precisely 0.25. However, we are still off by almost .01 from a quarter day. That .01 adds up to 1 in 100 years.

Therefore, we need to skip a leap year every 100 years. If we didn't do that, we'd be adding too many days to the calendar.

But wait! That still isn't perfect! We'll still get out of sync with solar time if we don't take it a step further.

Advertisement. Scroll to Continue.

We Need to Add an Extra Day Every 400 Years

As you can see, we still have that extra .0026 that we are off when skipping a leap year every 100 years. If you add that up, with some rounding error, that .0026 is a little over one day every 400 years (.0026 x 400 = 1.04).

That means skipping a leap year every 100 years also needs adjustment. We need to add a day back in. So, we need to have a leap year every 400 years to get that one extra day added back.

The easiest way to add that missing day back in is "not to skip" a leap year when the year is a multiple of 400. In other words, we keep February 29th on the calendar every 400 years, even though it is a multiple of 100.

To say all this in a simple sentence:

We add a day every four years, but not every 100 years, unless it's a fourth-century year, at which point we do add that extra day anyway.

But there's more involved! Besides adding days, we need to add seconds every so often. I'll explain that next.

Table of Leap Years and Reasons for Them

YearSkip Leap Year if Multiple of 100Unless it's a Multiple of 400Leap Year?
1600-YesYes
1700YesNoNo
1800YesNoNo
1900YesNoNo
2000-YesYes
2004No-Yes
2008No-Yes
2012No-Yes
2016No-Yes
2020NoNoYes
2024NoNoYes
2100YesNoNo
As indicated in this table, we add a day for a leap year every four years, but not every 100 years unless it's a year divisible by 400.

When Are Leap Seconds Added?

That mathematical formula for leap years is still not perfectly accurate, and we need to add a few seconds once in a while to compensate for the following events:

To improve the accuracy of our time clocks, we need to adjust our calendar by adding a second or two every year. It's called a leap second.3

Scheduling the addition of an extra second to a year is done to make these adjustments when required.

The additional second is usually added just before midnight (23:59:60) Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), on June 30th or December 31st.

Advertisement. Scroll to Continue.

Prior Leap-Second Time Adjustments

The International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service is the agency that decides when to make leap-second time adjustments.

They apply a leap second whenever necessary to keep our clock from being more than nine-tenths of a second off.

Here is a table of dates when an additional second was added. Each addition is done at midnight (UTC):

As a Final Point: It's an Ongoing Challenge

With our current technology, we can keep our clocks in sync with how we represent time.

But it's an ongoing challenge to keep our time measurements accurate since physical events like earthquakes can nudge the Earth just enough to require further adjustments.

Was this meaningful to you? Tap

Further Reading Based on Your Interests

References

  1. Physical Measurement Laboratory. (October 19, 2018). "NIST-F1 Cesium Fountain Atomic Clock" - NIST Time and Frequency Division
  2. Michael Winter (March 14, 2011). "Quake shifted Japan coast about 13 feet, knocked Earth 6.5 inches off axis" - USA Today
  3. James Jespersen, Jane Fitz-Randolph. (1999). "From Sundials To Atomic Clocks: Understanding Time and Frequency" " - National Institute of Standards and Technology. p. 110.
Originally published June 25, 2012 on Owlcation, a discontinued HubPages network site.
 




See mt review of TurboTax